What are your thoughts? Log in or Sign uplog insign up
level 1
Gotta like how he actually brought up the KARMA incident
level 1
“Leclerc would have gotten a penalty if there were contact”.
Is this a joke from FIA?
Hamilton avoids a crash because he got pushed off the track and the guy that pushed him off gets away without a penalty because the other guy avoided a high speed crash.
level 2
It was the same with Vettel’s and Stroll’s penalties. Vettel got a harsher penalty because there was contact involved even though Gasly had to (like Hamilton) drive off track to avoid a collision with Stroll.
level 1
So Jolyon did think it was a penalty. Wonder what people will say to that
level 2
Well he has a decent explanation which is always welcomed, and I hope people can remember that not everyone have to agree on everything.
level 2
If it’s anything like Canada it’s downvote and hate on them until they say something they agree with and then praise them like they are the best analyst
level 1
this guy needs to be a race steward. It’s clear he has a great analytical mind
level 2
I can’t believe that it’s not popular opinion that “hard racing” isn’t zig zagging and pushing people off the track before you even get to a corner…
And that contact almost always dependent on how well the other driver avoids the incident and should have no impact on the penalty
level 1
What Leclerc did looks like what Magnussen does every race, but nobody really cares. Not saying it shouldn’t be a penalty just that nobody says anything until something happens with the top drivers
level 1
It was pretty clear cut. If Vettel and Gasly are rear ending vehicles that aren’t weaving … then can you imagine the carnage with cars weaving all over?
level 1
Palmer hit it right on the nail.
All of Leclerc’s moves in isolation are okay and can be classified as pushing the limit but it’s one after the other, with a warning already.
level 2
He understands it very well and points out the issues with it in his BBC article earlier this week.
0 Comments