stage 1
The banking was never the topic, I’m no longer certain why folk are so hell-twisted on making the comparison.
The topic was the diamond sample Indianapolis had grooved into the turn causing surprising lateral pulling.
stage 2
It was a aggregate. Michelin already had factors the year before nonetheless the diamond lower surface like minded amplified the factors design more
stage 2
It wasn’t a diamond sample, it was straight grooves that contain been lower the usage of diamonds.
stage 2
Attention-grabbing, I’ve never heard about this.
Develop of some links with data? Can no longer procure something on google about it.
stage 1
That wasn’t Indianapolis’s different both ?
stage 2
They weren’t banking on it, you indicate?
stage 1
Its looks no longer probably to overhaul there. Finest on one corner on bendy section and then main straight. That video causes dismay like minded taking a study any person riding around it.
I predict a loooots of safety autos there and autos caught in sand traps all around it.
stage 1
Wow, you indicate folk who if truth be told discontinuance this as as a profession know more than a bunch of armchair specialists on r/formula1? Who would’ve thunk?
stage 1
Doesnt Nurburgring contain a banked corner ? Or we like minded pretending it doesnt exist ?
stage 2
Why does it topic? Nurburgring isn’t within the F1 calendar. Plus the Nurburgring banking is on a a lot slower corner.
stage 2
that banking is a 100-130 kmh corner I train.
Zandvoort 250
stage 2
F1 autos could possibly possibly desire it above 200 km/h even with out the banking. With the banking, the speed there is always somewhere within the variety of 280-300 km/h. Heavenly shy of the 300-310 km/h they did in Indy.
0 Comments