The FIA truly want to originate explaining its choices. “Failed to are attempting to alter the grip of the track ground” is the kind of imprecise line.
Does it indicate they did dry the track, however now not in one plan that altered the grip (is unnecessary to me), or that they did dry the track, however now not within the stammer where his automobile modified into situated, or that they didn’t dry the track, or that they tried to dry the track however now not now not truly succeed, or even even one thing else.
What I want to peek is one thing fancy: “This modified into the true fee, this right here is what the foundations declare, right here is how we define that, right here is what, in step with us occurred, essentially based totally on proof X and Y, and right here is why we possess that modified into / modified into now not, a violation of these rules”.
Something fancy (let’s assume, I personal now not know if this modified into the reasoning): “Crimson Bull modified into charged with drying the track. The rules declare ‘It is doubtless you’ll even be now not allowed to dry the track to set apart an revenue’. Our interpretation of that’s that the drying needs to be deliberate, which we discontinuance now not possess occurred, essentially based totally on video proof and Crimson Bull’s testimony”.
This elegant now’s lawful a shaggy dog myth. No one is conscious of what’s occurring, nobody understands what’s occurring, choices lawful seem entirely random.
0 Comments