stage 1
I mediate what many persons are missing is “perceived”. He is now not if truth be told asserting salvage the most unhealthy tracks…but he wants the tracks to feel provoking. I for one agree with that…Mugello is a supreme example.
stage 1
Interested by how unhealthy the earlier Zandvoort became (Braveness, Williamson, and Ferrer (though in 2014)), I don’t mediate we want to head assist to the years of unhealthy racing.
We want overtaking opportunities, now not flat out or atomize out.
stage 1
I desire a note that FEELS provoking but isn’t. A note that is subtle to nail, affords racing, and where note limits are without say enforced. I must always now not hunting for a driver pointless.
stage 2
Yet that is precisely what zafelli mentioned.
stage 2
Devour Monza. At the very least I realizing Leclerc became if truth be told injure after his shunt there.
stage 2
how about low friction delrin planks in the margins which urged autos running wide to slump diagram out and end drivers going wide? desire a moto gp note, elegant unbolt the planks and also you’re assist to abnormal tarmac. after a couple of feet of sliding you’re assist on fantastic devoted tarmac runoff, but with flat spots and pointed the unsuitable diagram.
autos you poke out and be on the literal edge extra most steadily, causing extra pleasure. repaint and reroute paul ricard to be much less painfully gruesome and a little bit much less insensible and also you’d have a perchance respectable spin note.
stage 2
Suzuka is an even looking out note of his. I mediate it hits your components.
stage 1
He is entirely elegant. Mugello saved me on the brink of my seat your whole diagram by because it if truth be told felt as if a mistake may perhaps discontinue your spin there after which in situation of simply dirtying your tyres and shedding you 15 seconds.
stage 1
The well-known factor here is “perceived as the most unhealthy imaginable“. I don’t mediate anybody can sing that many safety aspects in trendy F1 tracks are overkill, in the sense that the runoffs may perhaps very correctly be phenomenal smaller and the circuits would silent be devoted. Zandvoort and Mugello don’t match that mould and they are completely devoted, so clearly the FIA has been diagram too cautious with their Grade 1 requirements for a while.
And to these that recount that hazard (or perceived hazard) is irrelevant, query your self why the most difficult tightrope acts are now not performed 5 cm above the ground.
stage 2
Fantastic the FIA has been too cautious with 2 vital driver deaths and endless finish calls at traditional circuits previously 6 years. Give me a damage.
stage 1
stage 1
He seems somewhat achieved as regards note construct. Test studiodromo.it
Maybe he does be aware note safety…
Moreover, all these comments of the ‘how dare he’ vain are a tad ironic. What makes of us here anymore licensed to discuss note safety?
stage 1
He is now not asserting anything controversial, or now not it’s straightforward logic. The simplest note is particular person that seems unhealthy but is trendy and has spin off in the elegant locations. It is possible you’ll perchance well perhaps if truth be told have a straightforward note in the midst of a concrete desert with miles of runoff and it may perhaps perchance well be terribly insensible. We can not have tracks relish in the earlier days where one mistake leads to death. So there wants to be a cautious compromise between excessive velocity sturdy corners and ample runoff dwelling to be devoted ample.
The larger say is expense. Valid property charges money, which is one of the significant significant reasons why trendy tracks are smaller and have tighter turns than older tracks. Zandvoort’s an example of that too, where a immense chunk of the note wanted to be sold off to finance the relaxation of it getting as much as this level. Disgrace, former Zandvoort became somewhat lawful.
stage 1
Have in suggestions, he mentioned ‘We’d relish tracks that are perceived as the most unhealthy imaginable.’
He did now not recount he became actively making an are trying to originate the note to be unhealthy, or even that the note became ACTUALLY unhealthy. There is nothing unsuitable with looking out the note you’re designing to be intimidating to the celebrated viewer. Correct explore at Laguna Seca, that note is now not that immense in terms of passing in assorted sequence, but seeing autos ship it down the corkscrew positively makes for some thrilling viewing. I’m sure the contemporary banking in the ideal corner of Zandvoort will provide something identical.
stage 1
How about we salvage a note with a lawful layout that enables autos to spin, the drivers to celebrate and or now not it’s devoted? Some of us if truth be told relish to reside on the brink
stage 2
I know its now not relish this fella is driving the F1 autos himself is he?
stage 1
What a silly statement…
A lawful F1 note is a note that has a lawful toddle with the budge to it. A few overtaking opurtunity’s and has lawful safety. Nobody wants a note thats unhealthy. We’ve got had these previously and yeah….
Moreover as a topic of truth which you may also presumably salvage a lawful note on a noteworthy car car automobile parking space while you happen to tryed.
stage 2
Emerson Fittipaldi
Long-established Poster10 components · 3 hours ago
Re. tracks in parking loads – they’ve tried that and it became a if truth be told intensive failure: Caesars Palace Wide Prix
It be most steadily rated as one of the significant worst tracks ever created.
stage 2
PERCEIVED as unhealthy. There’s a incompatibility. And you name THAT a silly statement
0 Comments